![]() The situation with OnePlus's "cheating" is exactly the same thing. Good luck just filing a class lawsuit with Chinese company lmao. Problem was they didn't notify users about it or give them choice and that's where "battery gate" came from, not all the stuff people make up here.Īnd only reason there was lawsuit and they paid it because it's a big American company. They weren't doing this on phones with good batteries to imply planned obsolescence and if you replaced battery, you restored full performance. Phone isn't as fast, but it's still usable and wouldn't shut down anymore. Without chipset slowdown, phones were turning off and Apple mitigated that by simply slowing down chipset so it doesn't pull as much amps from battery to cause a shutdown. All the complaining came from lack of communication about the feature. Not that you Android fans would know what's like to use phone for 5+ years when you lose software support after just 2 but anyways. How the frigging hell was Apple "caught" degrading battery when they were doing performance degrading IN RESPONSE to battery degradation which comes with age and usage. moreOh god, just proves you people have absolutely no clue what batterygate was even about yet you all harp about it endlessly like donkeys. Nobody pays 125 million dollar for no reason. Anonymous, Battery gate drama was entirely different.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |